![]() The racquet swung fairly fast, and in the sweetspot, I was rewarded with precision and easy depth. ![]() When I had the time to get the racquet in the perfect position, things went smoothly and felt good. I enjoyed this racquet a lot when I was drilling, and it had my favorite feel among the VS racquets currently on the market. She said, "This playtest was a bit of a mixed bag for me. While this update became Michelle's favorite of the VS family, it wasn't a perfect pairing for her game. When I made clean contact and played confident tennis, the result was too good to put it down." Full-speed point play was where this racquet shined. To address that, I restrung at a lower tension to create better feel in the upper part of the hoop. The ball still landed in the court, but the quality of the shot dropped off quite a bit. The drawback came with shots out near the tip of the frame. I loved the response of the 16x20 string pattern, which added control without giving up very much spin. My hitting partners commented on how my forehand felt heavier than usual. The racquet itself didn't provide all that much power, but the command over the ball gave me the confidence to hit big shots. The sweetspot created a connected feel and predictable ball that I could trust to hit small targets. Considering the weight of the frame, it felt quick through my strokes. He explained, "At times, I played some of my best tennis this year with the Babolat Pure Strike VS, but there were a few downsides. Sage found the racquet to perform best during point play. The Pure Strike VS deployed speed and control from the baseline, but our team did have a few hesitations. With the Pure Strike VS, Babolat proves it can rein in the power and successfully highlight touch. Babolat has included a leather grip on this racquet to further cement its credentials as a classic, connected performer. The testers welcomed the addition of a 16x20 string pattern to the Pure Strike family, and they appreciated how the pattern paired with a co-poly string to bite the ball for spin while also playing a big role in controlling changes of direction and depth. This frame's particular layup of graphite gave a nice, flexible response that was gentle on the arm and led to a quality ball off the stringbed. Bringing more control than its Pure Drive and Pure Aero counterparts, the racquet gave our team the tools they needed to dictate points by finding the open court. When they did get it on court, the Pure Strike VS rewarded our testers with pinpoint targeting and impressive feel. Such was the case when our team saw the specs of the new Pure Strike VS. I had the PO7 playtest version - It was decent but I would not switch to it after already having gone through several rackets that played much better.Every once in a while, a racquet starts to generate buzz within the TW testing crew even before the first ball is hit. The Pure Strike is harsh on the shoulder, lower powered than the blade, and was more difficult for me to get good biting topspin on the ball - felt like a pretty dense 16X19. The CV version is not bad but felt like it lost the plow on the serve & came in several grams overweight. ![]() With the 18X20 blade, my backhand slice and volley is automatic but floats with the 16X19 - still working on dialing it in. I can hit both flat and spinny sharp cross-court angled shots. It crushes the serve and is a tank from the baseline. Agree with DJTaurus about the great connection & feedback on shots - nearly every hit feels like a shot in the sweet spot. It has great plow, is solid on contact, and great stability (does not twist easily). In my experience, the 2015 Blade 16X19 is a much better racket than the Pure Strike 16X19 (PO7 and the original Pure Strike).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |